Toby on Tuesday 
‘This precious stone’

 
 
     
      
      
    
     In his poem, ‘The Secret People’, G.K. Chesterton wrote, “Smile 
at us, pay us, pass us;  but do not quite forget;  For we are the people
 of England, that have never spoken yet…”   Well, on Thursday 7th May 
the people of England will speak.   And last Thursday 23rd April it was 
both St. George’s Day and the anniversary of the birth in 1564 of 
William Shakespeare, the poet of England and of all humanity.
St. George himself was a soldier in the Roman army who in the year 
303 was martyred for his Christian faith.   Yet in England he came to be
 venerated as a powerful defender against evil, in the form of a dragon,
 and in 1222 his feast day was declared a national holiday.   Then the 
custom waned and 23rd April was forgotten.   Now, just as Ireland 
celebrates St. Patrick’s Day and Scotland St. Andrew’s Day, so UKIP is 
calling for St. George’s Day to become a national holiday once more in 
England and also for St. David’s Day to be a holiday in Wales.   Perhaps
 this will be one more step towards a federal United Kingdom, to which 
the logic of events is leading.
The current political settlement is certainly unsustainable.   Under 
the so-called Barnett formula, devised by Joel Barnett who later 
described it as “shamefully unfair”, public spending in Scotland is 
running at around £1,400 more per head annually than in England.   The 
cost is around £5.5 billion per annum   UKIP will ensure that the 
funding relationship between England and Scotland is put on a fair and 
balanced basis, even though at the time of last year’s Scottish 
referendum the Conservatives, Labour and LibDems all committed 
themselves to maintaining it intact.   The formula is increasingly 
unjust and adds to the divisions between England and Scotland.   As for 
the ScotsNats, they have played their hand brilliantly, sensing the 
weakness and cowardice of the three old English parties, then holding 
them to ransom with great skill and cunning.
Equally, the logic of devolution must mean that at every stage of the
 legislative process, English votes alone must in future be secured for 
English laws.   It is for others to decide whether the House of Commons 
should become an English Parliament and the House of Lords an elected 
Senate, but that must be the direction for a federal United Kingdom.   
So perhaps it is best to leave the last word on this subject to to the 
immortal bard himself.   Born in Stratford-on-Avon on 23rd April, 1564, 
he now belongs to the world and to humanity itself.   And in his 
‘Richard II’, the dying John of Gaunt declares,
“This royal throne of kings, this scepter’d isle,
This earth of majesty, this seat of Mars,
This other Eden, demi-paradise,
This fortress built by Nature for herself
Against infection and the hand of war,
This happy breed of men, this little world,
This precious stone set in a silver sea,
Which serves it in the office of a wall,
Or as a moat defensive to a house,
Against the envy of less happier lands,
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England…”
Until next Tuesday!
Toby
     
 
 
 
 
            
        
          
        
          
        
Toby on Tuesday 
‘The Isles of Greece’

 
     
      
      
    
     It was the ancient Greeks who invented democracy – indeed the 
word itself derives from the Greek demos (the people) and kratia (power 
or rule).   And in UKIP we love democracy above all else.   But the 
funny thing is that, although Nelson Mandela is revered for giving his 
life to the creation of a self-governing democracy in South Africa, 
Mahatma Gandhi is revered for doing exactly the same in India and, going
 further back, George Washington likewise in the United States, whenever
 members of UKIP call for Britain to be a self-governing democracy once 
more they are dismissed as ‘fruitcakes, loonies and closet racists’.   
Yet infantile abuse only strengthens us in our purpose.
But to return to Greece, even the most ardent Eurofanatic has to 
recognise that the whole crazy project is unravelling on Europe’s 
Southern border.   When the Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras visited 
President Putin in Moscow recently, the shape of the new geopolitics 
became clear.   Without its own currency able to find a proper level in 
international markets, Greece has been driven to penury and humiliation 
by the EU and the European Central Bank.   And even the most ardent 
Eurofanatic must recognise the sense of anger and grievance that now 
prevails in Athens, where democracy was first born.
Old memories, too, have reawakened.   Anyone who saw the 
unforgettable film, “Captain Corelli’s Mandolin”, with Nicolas Cage as 
Corelli, John Hurt as Dr. Iannis and Penelope Cruz as his daughter 
Pelagia, will know that memories of German atrocities in World War 2, 
not only in Cephallonia but throughout Greece, still resonate.   And 
before then, centuries of misrule at the hands of Turkey are engraved on
 the Greek psyche (another Greek word from Psukhe, meaning breath, life,
 soul).   So fear of Turkish accession to the EU, sponsored primarily by
 Germany, has only reinforced Greece’s turning to the embrace of her old
 ally, Russia.
So the dye is cast and, not for the first ti
me, the geopolitics of 
the Balkans will determine the whole future of the Continent of Europe. 
  And where should Britain stand in this?   Certainly not in propping up
 the failing rule from Brussels and Berlin, and certainly not in bailing
 out the European Central Bank when Greece is in default on her loans.  
 Rather, we should watch events unfold, protect our own finances from 
the looming fall-out and wish the people of Greece well.   Last Sunday 
19th April saw the anniversary of the death at Missolonghi in 1824 of 
the poet Byron, who gave his life for the cause of Greek independence 
from Turkey.   Byron is little read now, but his words have a special 
resonance as Greece fights for her survival -
“The isles of Greece, the isles of Greece!
Where burning Sappho loved and sung,
Where grew the arts of war and peace, -
Where Delos rose, and Phoebus sprung!
Eternal summer gilds them yet,
But all, except their sun, is set.
The mountains look on Marathon -
And Marathon looks on the sea;
And musing there an hour alone,
I dream’d that Greece might still be free,
For standing on the Persians grave,
I could not deem myself a slave.”
Until next Tuesday!
Toby
     
 
 
 
 
            
        
          
        
          
        
Toby on Tuesday 
'Oh what a Circus!'

 
     
      
      
    
     
May 7th is an important anniversary.   It is next month’s 
Polling Day.   And on 7th May, 1919, in a remote village in rural 
Argentina, Eva Duarte Peron was born.   At 15, she had left for Buenos 
Aires in search of fame and fortune.   By 1945, she had married Juan 
Peron, who in the following year became President of Argentina.   So she
 entered history and the Argentine Congress named her “Spiritual Leader 
of the Nation”.   Yet in 1952, at the age of 33, she died of cancer.   
And thanks to Andrew Lloyd Webber and Time Rice she has achieved 
immortality as “Evita”.
I am still singing “Don’t Cry for Me Argentina” as I write this, for 
last Thursday Fiona and I went to the Ryedale Youth Theatre/Kirkham 
Henry Performing Arts production of “Evita” in Malton.   All that I can 
say is that I am in awe of everyone connected with it.   “Evita” is a 
fantastically difficult production to stage and perform, yet this young 
company achieved their goal with astonishing grace and skill.   Hannah 
Richardson, still only 16 and doing her A-Levels at Lady Lumley’s (where
 I shall be on 20th and 27th April for two Question Times) was a truly 
outstanding Eva, well up to London professional standards.   Her 
husband, Juan Peron, was played by Adam Peel, 17 and at Norton Sixth 
Form (where I shall be on 15th April), who made the perfect Latin 
American dictator.   Dom Weatherill, on stage for almost all the 
performance, was truly outstanding as Che.   Ollie Fearn made a fine 
Magaldi, the Argentinian singer and guitarist, while Beth Armstrong, as 
Peron’s mistress, touched everyone with her beautiful voice.   So 
there’s no need to go to London’s West End when you have talent of this 
quality in Ryedale.   A big thank you to Ryedale Youth Theatre and 
Kirkham Henry Performing Arts for an unforgettable evening.
Yet the genius of Andrew Lloyd Webber and Time Rice cannot hide the 
depressing truth that Juan and Eva Peron left Argentina, with its huge 
resources, destitute.   Behind their facade of helping the poor, they 
plundered the country.   And after 1945 they welcomed Nazis fleeing 
Germany, including Adolf Eichmann and Josef Mengele, Hitler’s “Angel of 
Death”, in return for treasures stolen from the victims of the 
holocaust.   And they were no friends to Britain.   Of course, not much 
has changed in Argentina since then.   The country is still bankrupt and
 still in default on its overseas debts.   And it continues to defy 
international law in all its dealings.   Only last week the Argentine 
ambassador was summoned to the Foreign Office in the escalating dispute 
over the Falkland Islands.   Argentina had just threatened to prosecute 
oil firms working in the waters around the Islands without formal 
permission from Buenos Aires, another trumped-up claim from the 
preposterous President Kirchner as she deflects attention from her 
disastrous record at home.
But despite all this, Britain has still managed to hand Argentina 
£225 million from our Overseas Aid budget over the past 20 years.   In 
addition, Argentina receives around £50 million under the EU’s own 
foreign aid budget, of which we contribute around £7 million.   The 
purpose of this is to enhance Spanish influence in Argentina, the same 
Spain that is threatening Gibraltar, just as Argentina is threatening 
the Falklands.   Stable, enduring, law-abiding Gibraltar and the 
Falklands are under pressure on account of the failed policies of these 
bullies and yet we continue to hand cash over to them, a policy that is 
both foolish and immoral.   And recently, Russia has agreed to 
lease/lend to Argentina 12 Sukhoi SU-24 Supersonic all-weather attack 
aircraft, well able to reach the Falklands.   One is tempted to ask if 
British money was used to fund this deal.   Whenever anyone questions 
UKIP’s determination to end the scandal of Overseas Aid, it is worth 
reminding them of these facts.
So the story of Eva Peron made for a musical of genius thanks to the 
skills of Andrew Lloyd Webber and Tim Rice, and last Thursday was an 
evening of magic thanks to all that Yorkshire talent.  But please don’t 
be deceived about the truth of life in Argentina then or now.   The 
threat is there and the folly of those here and in the EU who send 
Overseas Aid to the country is greater than ever.   No, we won’t cry for
 Argentina, but we may may just need to up our defence spending and 
prepare to see off the bully-boys of the South Atlantic once more!
Until next Tuesday!
Toby
     
 
 
 
 
Even the flowers know…
 
 A huge thank you to one of our members for allowing us to use this amazing photo of his Aquilegia (also known as the ‘Aqukipilegia’) resplendent in UKIP colours!
Sometimes it’s too easy to get tied up with the nitty gritty and forget 
the beauty around you. Thank you for the reminder Jim, it’s appreciated.
 
 
 
            
        
          
        
          
        
‘Polar Opposites’

 
     
      
      
    
     
My attention was drawn to a recent social media post from a 
Liberal Democrat candidate, highlighting a quote from Paddy Ashdown 
about UKIP and Nigel Farage. “We are the polar opposite of everything 
that he stands for” Mr Ashdown told the LibDems in Hampshire. The 
candidate went one step further, and announced he was ‘proud’ to be just
 that.
At first it seemed to be yet another political sound bite, until I thought about it in a little more detail…
Lets first look at the definition of ‘polar opposite’, a phrase we find 
ourselves using from time to time. It is the ‘exact opposite’, ‘opposite
 in every way’. It’s what day is to night, what laughing is to crying, 
it’s what Russell Brand is to haircuts. It’s a simple concept, and yet 
when used in politics, can be very revealing.
What is it about UKIP that the Libdems claim to be polar opposites to? 
Well, ‘everything’ according to Mr Ashdown. Let’s take a look at a 
little of what UKIP proposes to give to the NHS, £3bn more directed to 
frontline services, elderly social care funded with £1bn per year and 
scrapping tuition fees for medical students (on a means tested basis). 
Just a few policies, but I’m sure you can work out for yourselves what 
the ‘polar opposites’ of those are.
If the Liberal Democrats so wish, I can produce them a ‘Pledge Card’ 
very similar to the one UKIP released recently. It would be a basic 
design I’m afraid, my time is limited at the moment, but, it would 
feature the ‘polar opposites’ of UKIPs pledge we have made on our own 
card.
I’m thinking a plain design, yellow or orange, with just 5 points on it.
 Basic as I’ve said, but it will highlight just how proudly ‘polar 
opposite’ they are to UKIP.
The Liberal Democrats Polar Opposite Pledge to Britain:
1. Say YES to the EU
2. Don’t control our borders
3. Don’t fund the NHS
4. Increase foreign aid spending
5. More tax
You’re very welcome.
In line with those pledges, I’m sure we can also look forward to 
increased hospital parking charges, defence cuts, wishing to only trade 
within the EU whilst ignoring the rest of the world market and the 
eradication of Britain’s farming and fishing industry. HS2 would 
continue to eat up billions of pounds until the next vanity project 
comes along and the green belt will be nothing more than a grassy 
memory.
“But!”, I hear the Liberal Democrats cry, “But we didn’t say that! What we said is that we are the polar opposite to UKIP!”
Yes, I believe you probably are.
Dave
     
 
 
 
 
            
        
          
        
          
        
  
   
Toby on Tuesday 
'Attack of the Clones'
 
 
     
      
      
    
     Last week, Parliament was dissolved and the General Election 
really got going.   One late surprise in Thirsk and Malton was the 
announcement by Philip Tate that he would be standing as an independent 
candidate opposed to fracking for shale gas.   I know him to be a man of
 complete integrity, passionately committed to the cause for which he is
 campaigning.   Although I believe him to be over-pessimistic about its 
consequences, in a world of spin and focus groups politics desperately 
needs candidates driven by their beliefs and not simply by a wish for 
office.   On this basis, the greater the range of candidates standing, 
the better it will be for our democracy.
The sad truth is that the three old parties, Conservative, LibDem and
 Labour, have in effect merged into a single entity called ‘the 
political class’.   Over the coming weeks, voters will need a microscope
 to identify any real difference between their manifestos.   All three 
believe in squandering £50 billion on the unwanted and damaging HS2, to 
remain in the whole failed EU project with its porous borders, including
 borders on Syria, Iraq and Iran if the Euromaniacs have their way and 
Turkey joins the ‘Club’, to enforce an 80% reduction in carbon emissions
 under the ludicrous Climate Change Act just as our population is 
heading for 100 million, to dissipate £13 billion a year on Overseas 
“Aid” and to redefine marriage.   All of this will be paid for by 
dismantling our defences at a time of looming international danger.    
In essence, all three parties are now interchangeable.
And it is on defence, that essential insurance policy in a troubled 
world, that their contrast to UKIP becomes all-too clear.   As our 
excellent Defence Spokesman, Mike Hookem MEP, has put it so succinctly, 
“UKIP are determined to stop the neglect of our troops and increase the 
UK’s operational capabilities.   We also pledge to properly meet our 
minimum 2 per cent GDP NATO spending commitment and restore the defence 
budget to pre SDSR 2010 levels.   This will mean an extra £3 billion per
 year being available for defence spending.”   Astonishingly, he was 
supported last week by none other than General Lord Dannatt, Chief of 
the General Staff from 2006 to 2009, who wrote in the Daily Telegraph, 
“It is not just the Conservative Party that refuses the 2 per cent GDP 
commitment but the Labour Party too.   Perhaps both parties are mutually
 comforted by a balance of refusal.   Only UKIP takes the contrary 
view.”   It may be stretching the imagination, but it is almost as if 
the Conservative and Labour parties were planning for a “Grand 
Coalition” with each other after 7th May just to keep out the Scottish 
Nationalists – an outlandish idea perhaps, but one which has already 
been strongly floated by the Conservative’s Ken Baker and Labour’s 
Gisela Stuart.
And UKIP will also ensure that the latest bizarre ruling that the 
European Convention on Human Rights should apply to soldiers in foreign 
war zones never becomes a reality.   Our Supreme Court ruled last year 
that European Human Rights legislation should be available to those 
fighting British troops, opening up our armed forces to endless 
prosecutions by our enemies.   Already, more than 1,200 public law 
claims have been filed against the Ministry of Defence over the Iraq 
War, as well as a further 1,000 private law claims.   It beggars belief 
at a time of increasing global threats that Britain’s fighting power 
should be threatened in this way, irrespective of the slashing of our 
defence budget.   This is all part of the obsession of the political 
class with what it calls ‘soft power’, i.e. Overseas Aid etc.   While 
certainly soft, no power accrues from it and instead it makes us the 
laughing stock of the world, from Moscow to Buenos Aires and Baghdad.
On 7th May there will be a chance to kick out our failed political 
class.   And as to Philip Tate’s anti-fracking campaign, whatever their 
candidates might say here, all three old parties are committed to shale 
gas.   UKIP’s common sense view is that Third Energy should be allowed 
to proceed with its trials at Kirby Misperton, with an underground 
pipeline to Knapton Generating Station.   These trials should be closely
 monitored by an inspection team that would certainly include Mr. Tate, 
before a final evidence-based decision is made on the security of the 
technology.   Ample time should be allowed before any further 
development is permitted.   But Thirsk and Malton will benefit from Mr. 
Tate’s intervention, as it will from any candidate who is serious about 
his or her cause, not merely greedy to have the two letters M and P 
after their name!
Until next Tuesday! 
Toby